Simulating Natural Disasters

Major Yang

Volume 1 • Issue 1

We’ve all heard in the news: Budget cuts all over our federal government, thanks to our friends at DOGE. While I’m all for trying to cut wasteful spending, it’s important to remember that not all programs have clear returns. Some programs rely on the concept of delayed gratification, and this is exactly what simulation technology for preventing natural disasters is. Investing in simulation technology to protect our environment may seem like a very expensive endeavor, however, it has proven essential time and time again. It has also been proven to be more cost-effective long-term, as it reduces the money needed to be invested in recovering from natural disasters that did not happen. Don’t get me wrong, natural disasters are one hell of an obstacle to deal with. But with global warming making our environment worse and driving up the frequency of natural disasters, the only way to fix this issue is to embrace and adapt new simulation technology. In this research paper, I will detail the virtues of using simulation technology to not only save lives but also taxpayer money long term.

Natural disasters pose a significant threat to our communities. As climate change exacerbates the frequency and severity of these events, predictive technologies, such as simulations, have become increasingly crucial for our communities to be prepared when they strike. Simulations can help forecast natural disasters, predict their area and level of impact, assess risks, and guide emergency response strategies to control damages optimally. This research paper will explore the methodologies used in disaster simulations, evaluate their accuracy, and examine the future prospects of simulation technology in natural disaster prediction.

Before we discuss the advancement of simulation technology, we must first understand the fundamentals regarding natural disasters and their destructive nature. Earthquakes are capable of collapsing infrastructure and invoking landslides, disrupting society within a radius of hundreds of miles. When a wildfire occurs, one single spark could lead to thousands of square miles of damage. Ignition sources can come from just about anything, ranging from lightning strikes, campfires, and power lines. Once ignition occurs, fires can travel up to 100 miles per hour and traverse hundreds of miles. Tornadoes can form rapidly out of nowhere, and they have extremely concentrated and violent destructive capabilities. Tornadoes can root out structures that are even rooted into the ground, such as houses and trees. Hurricanes also have the same concentrated destructive powers as tornadoes and are capable of dealing the same kinds of damage as tornadoes can, but they can also cause flooding due to the seawater
carried. With this in mind, it is clear that natural disasters represent a persistent and escalating threat to human populations and infrastructure worldwide.

The frequency and severity of unfortunate events such as hurricanes, earthquakes, tornadoes, and wildfires are only being exacerbated by the effects of global climate change. As our cities become more developed and we grow more urbanized as a society, we need to develop our methods of predicting and preparing for natural disasters accordingly. Accurate forecasting of such events is essential for mitigating their socio-economic and environmental impacts. Simulation technology plays a critical role in combating natural disasters by improving forecasting, response, and mitigation strategies.

Simulations can mitigate the harsh effects of natural disasters by forecasting when and how they will occur. This is possible by collecting environmental data, such as wind, temperature, and humidity. By keeping a close and careful eye on all of these inputs, we can predict, with fairly good accuracy, whether or not a natural disaster could occur any time soon. This is extremely crucial information for our society to have because it allows us to prepare for these natural disasters in advance. For example, we can issue evacuation orders in order to minimize the loss of life. We can also install defences to minimize structural damage for certain natural disasters, such as installing sandbags for floods. Through the technology of simulations, we have a crystal ball that could show us the future before it actually occurs, and this is key to fighting back against natural disasters.

Simulations can not only predict when natural disasters occur, but they can also predict how they occur. This means that simulations can predict the severity of natural disasters and which areas of the community they will impact the most. This is extremely crucial information for our society to have because it allows us to optimize our disaster recovery response. By knowing the general path of a hurricane or tornado, we can prepare a recovery protocol that prioritizes saving lives on that path. By knowing the epicenter and radius of an earthquake, we can prepare a recovery protocol that prioritizes saving lives near the epicenter. When it comes to saving lives, time is of the utmost essence. Simulations can help us save time by identifying where we need to focus recovery resources, when they are safe to be deployed, and how they should best be deployed.

Simulations can also help us mitigate the effects of natural disasters through developing disaster-resilient infrastructure. In the past, developing infrastructure took little to no account for the possibility of natural disasters. This was not for a lack of trying, but because they simply could not know for sure how well the architectural designs could hold up against a tornado or an earthquake due to a lack of technology. Simulations can help us fix this error by allowing us to test out potential city plans before the construction phase begins. This allows us to make new developments while being mindful of the effects of potential natural disasters. For example, cities can integrate catch basins into areas where flooding is common. Underground shelters can also be integrated into areas where tornadoes are common. These infrastructure techniques can not only help minimize the cost of potential damages, but they can also save lives. The concept of stress testing an actual infrastructure design against a natural disaster before it has been constructed in reality has always been a foreign concept until now. With the help of simulation technology, the threat of natural disasters could be a thing of the past.

We have gone a long way since simulation technology first began. As this technology develops, we will get more accurate and reliable readings on potential natural disasters, and we will be able to use this data to create better response plans. We have already seen some real-world examples of how this plays out, which I will outline here.

On the subject of wildfires, scientists Dr. Janice Coen at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) have developed a modern simulation model called the CAWFE model that predicts the spread of wildfires. It works by integrating atmospheric dynamics with fire behavior to simulate and predict wildfire spread. By applying weather prediction to the realm of fire behavior simulations, CAWFE is able to use simulation technology to more accurately forecast wildfire behavior. CAWFE is also extremely adaptable, allowing it to be used in educational settings as well as real-time forecasting. The model has also been used to visualize dangerous fire conditions, enhancing firefighter training and safety, saving the lives of not only our civilians but also our first responders. Efforts are also underway to integrate CAWFE into operational forecasting systems, aiming to provide timely and accurate predictions to assist in wildfire management and mitigation. In summary, CAWFE serves as a vital tool in the prediction and understanding of wildfires, offering detailed simulations that inform both emergency response and long-term planning.

On the subject of earthquakes, scientists Satir Onur, Kemec Serkan, etc. have developed a scientific simulation model known as CA-MARKOV, that cleverly implements
Markov chains in order to reliably and effectively predict the trajectory of Earthquakes. In the study “Simulating the Impact of Natural Disasters on Urban Development in a Sample of Earthquake” by Satir et al. (2023), the researchers employed simulation techniques to assess how the 2011 Van earthquake in Turkey influenced urban development patterns. Utilizing the Cellular Automata-Markov Chain (CA-MARKOV) model, they projected urban growth for the year 2018 under a hypothetical scenario where the earthquake had not occurred. By comparing this projection with actual satellite imagery from 2018, the study identified significant deviations attributable to the earthquake’s impact. According to the article, they invested in more peripheral urban development, invested less into development on ground-sensitive areas, and took into account many natural terrain features that would help minimize damage and save lives. Simulation technology tools are invaluable for urban planners and policymakers aiming to design resilient cities that can better withstand and recover from future seismic events.

On the subject of floods, scientists Masoud Bakhtyari Kia et al. have used GIS simulation technology along with artificial neural network technology in order to produce reliable flood models on the coasts of Malaysia. In their study, “An artificial neural network model for flood simulation using GIS: Johor River Basin, Malaysia,” Kia and his group were able to use GIS technology along with artificial neural network technology to model flooding by factoring in input sources such as rainfall and output sources such as runoff in order to produce accurate and predictive models of floods. This model would produce accurate levels of water rising above the surface, and these water levels can be directly translated into GIS shape files. Flash flooding is a large problem that affects not only Malaysia but the rest of the world. Data from these simulations provides valuable insight into understanding how flooding works, which areas are impacted most devastatingly, and how to optimize our recovery in time. According to Dr. Kia himself, “flood maps will be helpful for disaster planning in addition to an actual emergency response to the oods. Estimation of the ood inundation area is the most important duty and highest priority for decision makers and most relevant for national and local governments.”

RETURN TO THE ISSUE

The Simulated Turn

Volume 1 • Issue 1

Simulation technology can also have crucial applications in modelling not only the disaster itself, but also in modelling the recovery process. For instance, we all know that our healthcare system is far from optimized and that, in most cases, especially of natural disasters, medical resources get stretched extremely thin. Thanks to simulation technology, we might be able to take a step in the right direction. In the article “Principles of Scarce Medical Resource Allocation in Natural Disaster Relief: A Simulation Approach,” researchers Hui Cao and Simin Huang explore how simulation models can inform the allocation of limited medical resources during natural disasters. They developed a discrete event simulation to assess the efficiency of four triage principles: first-come, first-served, random selection, treating the most serious cases first, and treating the least serious cases first. The study found that under high resource scarcity, prioritizing less severe cases led to more lives saved, while random selection offered a balance between efficiency and ethical considerations. These findings suggest that simulation tools can aid in developing resource allocation strategies that optimize outcomes while addressing ethical concerns. Even if this may seem intuitive, by having the ability to crunch the numbers and to process recovery strategies through a simulation model, we are able to progress further as a society.

Simulation technology can be applied not only to the recovery process for medical resources but also for other first-responder taxpayer-funded resources. For instance, firefighters, search and rescue units, and other units need to be able to save as many lives as possible in the least amount of time. During moments of crisis, like natural disasters, time is of the essence. Simulation technology can be used to ensure that all available units are utilized to their fullest potential. It can make sure that each unit moves in the right direction, travels in an optimized route, and saves as many lives as possible. According to an article by Felix Wex et al. titled “Emergency response in natural disaster management: Allocation and scheduling of rescue units,” these experts have developed a professional scientific model that combines eight construction heuristics and five improvement heuristics in order to drastically improve the response times of first responders. According to Dr. Wex, “Our results show that problem instances (with up to 40 incidents and 40 rescue units) can be solved in less than a second, with results being at most 10.9% up to 33.9% higher than optimal values. Compared to current best practice solutions, the overall harm can be reduced by up to 81.8%.” These findings suggest that simulation tools can save lives and facilitate the allocation of resources while addressing ethical concerns. Even if this may seem intuitive, by having the ability to process recovery strategies through a simulation model, we are able to progress further as a society.

Natural disasters have devastating real-world consequences. Simulation technology is the best tool we have for combating their severe consequences. The growing body of evidence from wildfire modeling with CAWFE, first responder resource allocation simulations, and earthquake impact studies makes a compelling case for greater investment in simulation
technologies. These tools enable decision-makers to anticipate disaster scenarios, optimize responses, and mitigate long-term consequences. This is exactly why I would argue we must increase the scale of our government-funded simulation programs to take this technology to the next level. Make no mistake: this could be a very expensive program that could take years to perfect. But if all that work could translate into a more efficient and cost-effective recovery process, that would mean that this technology could save us billions of dollars long-term. This research and development has real-world consequences, whether it’s saving lives by predicting wildfire spread, ensuring the ethical and efficient use of scarce medical resources, or guiding safer post-earthquake urban development. Simulations are not just academic exercises, they are practical, life-saving instruments.

Works Cited

Coen, Janice. NCAR to Develop Wildland Fire Prediction System for Colorado, phys.org/news/2015-12-ncar-wildland-colorado.html. Accessed 15 May 2025.

“Forewarned is forearmed; Wildfires.” The Economist, vol. 428, no. 9103, 4 Aug. 2018, p. 69(US).

Soliman, Mohamed, et al. “Assessment of Implementing Land Use/Land Cover LULC 2020-ESRI Global Maps in 2D Flood Modeling Application.” Water, vol. 14, no. 23, Dec. 2022.

Kia, Masoud Bakhtyari. An Artificial Neural Network Model for Flood Simulation Using GIS: Johor River Basin, Malaysia, Heidelberg, Environmental Earth Sciences; Heidelberg Vol. 67, Iss. 1,  (Sep 2012)

Cao H, Huang S. Principles of Scarce Medical Resource Allocation in Natural Disaster Relief: A Simulation Approach. Medical Decision Making. 2012;32(3):470-476.

Allahverdi, A., et al. “Emergency Response in Natural Disaster Management: Allocation and Scheduling of Rescue Units.” European Journal of Operational Research, North-Holland, 24 Oct. 2013.